Royal Birkdale's open, treeless links terrain creates a dynamic range problem most golf photographers underestimate — the sky is often 4-5 stops brighter than the turf, and a phone's auto exposure will pick one and sacrifice the other. Shooting in HDR and compressing at a slightly higher quality setting than usual fixes both the capture and the file.
- ✓Links courses like Royal Birkdale have almost no vertical elements to block or diffuse light, producing a much wider dynamic range between sky and turf than a tree-lined parkland course
- ✓Your phone's auto exposure will consistently underexpose the grass to protect a bright sky, which is the single most common ruined golf photo
- ✓Shooting in HDR or RAW and correcting exposure afterward preserves detail that a single JPEG exposure throws away permanently
- ✓A wide dynamic range image compresses less efficiently than a flat-lit one, so links golf photos need a slightly higher quality setting than a shaded parkland shot to avoid banding in the sky
Bryson DeChambeau's strategic play through Royal Birkdale and Lucas Herbert's record-tying 62 have made this year's Open Championship worth photographing — and links golf courses like Birkdale are genuinely harder to shoot well than almost any other regular sporting venue. The reason isn't the swing or the crowd. It's the terrain itself. A treeless, dune-lined seaside course creates a dynamic range problem that catches out phone cameras and even some dedicated cameras on default settings, and it's worth understanding before you're standing at the 18th trying to get a usable photo of the leaderboard moment.
Why Links Courses Are a Different Photography Problem
Parkland golf courses — the tree-lined, manicured style most inland courses use — naturally break up light. Trees cast shade across parts of the fairway, backgrounds are darker and more uniform, and a camera's auto exposure has an easier time finding a middle ground between highlight and shadow. Links courses like Royal Birkdale are the opposite: flat, open, minimal tree cover, built along an exposed coastline specifically to be played in wind and shifting weather. That openness is what makes the golf compelling, and it's exactly what wrecks a casual photo.
With nothing breaking up the light, the sky above a links course is often four to five stops brighter than the turf and players standing on it. A camera has to pick one exposure value for the whole frame, and most auto modes protect the sky from blowing out white, which means the grass, the golfer, and anything at ground level ends up noticeably underexposed and dull in the resulting photo.
Fix It at Capture, Not After
The best fix happens before you press the shutter. If your phone supports HDR capture (most do by default now, but some sports/action modes disable it to keep shutter speed fast), leave it on for wide static shots of the course and turn it off only for the actual swing sequence, where you need shutter speed more than dynamic range. If you're shooting RAW on a dedicated camera, expose for the highlights and recover shadow detail in post — RAW files hold roughly two to three stops more recoverable shadow detail than a JPEG, which on a links course is frequently the entire difference between a usable and unusable frame.
Tapping to set exposure manually on the turf rather than the sky, even at the cost of slightly blown-out clouds, almost always produces a more usable result than letting auto-exposure protect the sky by default. A slightly bright sky reads as a minor flaw; a dark, murky fairway and golfer reads as a bad photo.
Why the File Itself Needs Different Compression Settings Too
A wide-dynamic-range scene doesn't just capture differently — it compresses differently too. An image with a large tonal range across sky, turf, and subject needs more bits to represent all those gradations cleanly than a flatter, more evenly lit scene does. Push a links golf photo through the same compression setting you'd use for an indoor arena shot and you'll see banding creep into the sky first, since sky gradients are large, smooth areas exactly like the glass and liquid problem in product photography — compression algorithms need more headroom to render a gradual sky transition than they do for high-contrast subject matter.
The practical fix is simple: treat wide-open, high-dynamic-range course photography as its own tier, and compress at quality 88 or above rather than the 75-80 that's fine for most casual sharing.
Practical Tips for Shooting This Week's Golf Coverage
- Expose for the ground, not the sky — a slightly bright sky reads better than a dark subject.
- Use HDR for wide course shots, disable it for the swing itself if it costs you shutter speed.
- Shoot RAW if you have the option — the recoverable shadow detail is worth the extra storage for a scene this contrasty.
- Compress at a higher quality setting than usual — links course photos need more headroom than shaded, indoor, or tree-lined shots.
What to Do With Your Course Photos
If you're coming home with a phone full of Open Championship photos this week, don't run them through a default compression preset built for flatter lighting. Optimage's compress tool lets you set a specific quality target, and convert to WebP or AVIF preserves sky gradients more cleanly than JPEG at an equivalent file size.
Related reading:
- Best Image Format for Sports Photography — broader format guidance across sports shooting conditions
- Wimbledon 2026 Day 3 White Kit Photo Tips — another sport where exposure discipline matters more than gear
- Avif vs WebP vs JPEG 2026 Benchmark — the technical comparison behind the format recommendation above
Continue reading
Try Optimage — it's free
Compress, convert, and optimize images in seconds. No sign-up, no limits.
Start Optimizing Free